Ask for an honest review of a genuine experience, without rewards or instructions to leave a particular rating. Make the request easy to decline and avoid prompting clients to reveal health or policy details.
Recommended approach
Use one neutral request at a sensible point in the service relationship. Apply the same process fairly rather than asking only people who express satisfaction. Separate a public review request from a private service-resolution channel, and check applicable carrier and agency policies.
Action checklist
- Ask about the service experience
- Avoid incentives and rating requests
- Provide the legitimate review link
- Do not solicit sensitive personal details
Example in practice
Template: “Thank you for working with our agency. If you would like to share your experience, you can leave an honest review here: [link]. Please avoid sharing private health or policy information. There is no obligation to leave a review.”
Mistakes to avoid
Buying reviews, offering discounts or filtering requests by expected rating can create policy problems. A review program should support real feedback, not manufacture an apparent track record.
A fair request process with clear boundaries
Choose a sensible service moment for the request, then use the same neutral approach consistently. The person should be free to decline and write their own description. Do not require a satisfaction survey result before revealing the public review link. Keep service recovery available to everyone, independently of whether a public review is posted. Check the agency’s own applicable policies before using the request in beneficiary-facing communications or an automated sequence.
Use this operational message: “If you would like to share your experience with our agency, you can leave an honest review at [link]. Please do not include private health, account or policy information. Your decision to review does not affect the service you receive.” Adapt the exact language through the agency’s appropriate review. Do not add a reward, a star target or suggested claims about outcomes. The request should concern a real experience, not create social proof from someone who never used the service.
- Use a genuine direct review link.
- Do not filter by likely rating.
- Do not offer payment, gifts or discounts.
- Avoid prompting private or individualized details.
Responding without exposing a client relationship
Create a public-response rule before a difficult review arrives. Thank the reviewer for feedback where appropriate, stay factual and direct detailed questions to a private contact route. Do not confirm health information, policy status or what was discussed in a meeting. The purpose of the public reply is to show a professional process, not win an argument by revealing information the reviewer may not have intended to publish.
A neutral structure is: “Thank you for sharing your feedback. We take service concerns seriously. Please contact [public business route] so the appropriate team member can review the matter.” Use the business’s real process and avoid implying that the person is definitely a client when that is not established. If a review appears to violate platform rules, use the documented reporting route. Do not offer compensation for deleting or revising a negative review.
- Use a monitored private-resolution route.
- Keep confidential details out of replies.
- Document suspected policy violations accurately.
- Separate service resolution from review manipulation.
Questions agents ask
Can an agent offer a gift for a review?
Google prohibits incentives in exchange for reviews. Use a neutral request without a reward.
Sources & further reading
Primary references for the rules and platform mechanics discussed here. Templates and recommendations are Medicare Marketing’s planning guidance. Examples are illustrative unless explicitly sourced.
Turn the idea into a next step.
Use the free toolkit to check your local foundation, build a content rhythm, or plan a webinar.
Explore the tools →